« Latest Court Decision in Palmer/Sixth Street Properties v. City of LA May Affect Inclusionary Housing Ordinances | Home | CEQA’s One-Year Rule for Certifying an EIR Not Mandatory, Says First Appellate District »


'The Devil is in the Details' of Ninth Circuit's Decision on Municipal Sign Codes

The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 2009 WL 39250233 (9th Cir. 2009) reaffirms the Court’s acceptance that speaker-based and event-based exemptions to municipal sign codes may be a content-neutral regulation. Cities may confidently consider speaker-based and event-based exemptions to sign regulations but should take extreme care in drafting well tailored language.

However, as with all First Amendment inquiries, the devil is in the details. In this case, the aphorism is particularly true of speaker-based and event-based exemptions which are examples of the linguistic contortions often required for regulations to be considered content neutral. Find out more about those devilish details here.


Search this site:

Sponsored by

Subscribe to this blog by email
(enter email address in box below)

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

TOPICS

DISCLAIMER

  • This blawg is published by the attorneys and client relations team of Meyers Nave. It does not necessarily represent the views of our law firm or our clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by our clients. The purpose of this blawg is to assist in dissemination of information about public agency laws and trends. No representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this blawg is provided only as general information for education purposes, and blawg topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.

    By visiting this blawg site you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blawg should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This blawg site is not intended to solicit clients and Meyers Nave does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blawg in a state where this blawg site does not comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.