« U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Accepting Applications for Brownfield Grants | Home | Court of Appeal Holds Developer Cannot Sue City for Violations of CEQA and Constitutional Law Where City Rejects Project Before Completing EIR »


UPDATE: California Supreme Court to Review Appellate Court Determination that Prevailing Wage Law Does Not Apply to Locally Funded Projects of Charter Cities

On August 19, 2009 the California Supreme Court granted review of the Fourth Appellate District's opinion in State Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of Chula Vista.  In this case, the Court of Appeal determined on April 28, 2009 that on public works projects wholly financed by local funds, charter cities need not comply with California's Prevailing Wage Law.  Specifically, Court concluded that the prevailing wage law does not address matters of statewide concern and therefore charter cities are not required to comply with the prevailing wage law on public works contracts that are financed solely from City revenues because such contracts are municipal affairs over which the City has paramount power under the California Constitution.  Read more about the Appellate Court's opinion here.
 
The effect of the Supreme Court's grant of review is that the Appellate Court's published opinion can no longer be cited as precedential authority in California courts under California Rule of Court 8.1105(e)(1).  Additionally, the Supreme Court's action places charter cities in California in limbo with respect to whether they are required to comply with the Prevailing Wage Law on locally unded projects.  Check back to the Public Blawg later for further information.

Search this site:

Sponsored by

Subscribe to this blog by email
(enter email address in box below)

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

TOPICS

DISCLAIMER

  • This blawg is published by the attorneys and client relations team of Meyers Nave. It does not necessarily represent the views of our law firm or our clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by our clients. The purpose of this blawg is to assist in dissemination of information about public agency laws and trends. No representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this blawg is provided only as general information for education purposes, and blawg topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.

    By visiting this blawg site you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blawg should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This blawg site is not intended to solicit clients and Meyers Nave does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blawg in a state where this blawg site does not comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.