« Court Holds Prop 59 Does Not Abrogate the Common Law Mental Processes Principle | Home | A Claim for Severance Damages Based on a Temporary Construction Easement Must be Supported By Evidence that TCE Interfered with Owner's Actual Intended Use of the Property »


California Supreme Court Clarifies POBRA Provision Regarding Notification of Discipline

The California Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act ("POBRA") provides a limitations period specifying that punitive action may not be taken against a public safety officer unless the public agency completes its investigation and notifies the officer of the proposed disciplinary action within one year of discovering the alleged misconduct.  In May v. City of Los Angeles, the California Supreme Court held that this provision does not require an employer to provide notice of the specific proposed discipline within the limitations period, and noted that the fundamental purpose of the POBRA provision at issue was to place a one-year limitation on investigations of officer misconduct.  Employers are still required to notify the officer that discipline may be imposed for the identified misconduct within the limitations period.  To read the Supreme Court's decision click here.


Search this site:

Sponsored by

Subscribe to this blog by email
(enter email address in box below)

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

Public Law: Municipal Lawyer

TOPICS

DISCLAIMER

  • This blawg is published by the attorneys and client relations team of Meyers Nave. It does not necessarily represent the views of our law firm or our clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by our clients. The purpose of this blawg is to assist in dissemination of information about public agency laws and trends. No representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this blawg is provided only as general information for education purposes, and blawg topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.

    By visiting this blawg site you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blawg should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This blawg site is not intended to solicit clients and Meyers Nave does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blawg in a state where this blawg site does not comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.